Once upon a time, the area that these days comprises the United States was populated by people(s) now collectively referred to as Native Americans.
As is common knowledge, once the Europeans splashed ashore and set about establishing their shining city on the hill, the curtain inexorably began to ring down on the indigenous population, a process poetically styled “Manifest Destiny” by the newcomers.
Eventually, its most resilient and shrunken remainder ended up stashed away into so-called “reservations,” a term at the mere sound of which one can hardly imagine anyone—with the possible exception of John Wayne—not feeling at least a wee twinge.
there is not a single country in the world that wasn’t, in some way, founded by occupiers. Almost everywhere, there was someone there who was displaced or absorbed to make way for the current occupants.” [Source]
However, let’s assume that, in a well-meaning attempt to redress the historical wrong inflicted upon Native Americans, the international community, backed by the military megapower of Panginia, decides to restore a portion of the United States—let’s say the area currently taken up by the states of Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma—to native American control via installing there, in the midst of erstwhile U.S. territory, a brand-new country called the State of Nagi Tanka.
No one denies that the Native Americans were here first, so the argument can be made that this is, after all, their land.
Technically, of course, the State of Nagi Tanka should be a lot larger than the international community could agree on, but pragmatic constraints prohibit the restoring of the entire continent to the descendants of its quondam inhabitants; difficult enough to appease and make reasonable accommodations for millions of non-Native-American Nebraskans, Kansans, and Oklahomans, short of deporting them wholesale.
How would the United States react when faced with such a fait accompli wreaked upon them by others against its express wishes and in defiance of its most vehement objections?
Heaping insult and injury upon insult and injury, the state of Nagi Tanka, having adjudged its assigned borders as too constrictive for their continued comfort, soon takes to deploying construction crews into neighboring Texas and Colorado for the purpose of raising additional settlements.
Militarily, the U.S., alas, cannot hold a scrawny taper to Nagi Tanka’s biggest ally, the megapower of Panginia, a reality which has made the internationally sanctioned restitution of land to its original occupants possible in the first place and which dashes any hope of recovering the thus expropriated real estate using conventional force, or even halting its expansion.
Confronted with such a state of affairs, it stands to reason that the U.S. government and a sizable segment of its citizenry would be frothing at the kisser, to say the least. One can only speculate as to the myriad ways in which said frothing might instantiate, right-wing talk radio to the power of a thousand in terms of bellicosity directed at Nagi Tanka and Panginia, and wide-spread incinerations of their respective flags probably being its mildest manifestations.
Historically speaking, the colonialist gene has not been known for its ability to take things lying down.
Chances are that those who most passionately defend Israel’s right to exist would, with like abandon and using reverse logic, dispute Nagi Tanka’s.
But what to do if one’s own firepower is dwarfed by that of one’s detractors? What if all formal petitions to the United Nations to reconsider and dismantle the State of Nagi Tanka lead nowhere? And what if all the hunger strikes and the salt marches bear no fruit?
Having run out of non-violent alternatives, and with the conventional military option off the table, would the “greatest country in the world” stoop to tactics it has traditionally condemned in others as terrorism?
Or could it be that, on account of its vaunted exceptionalism and attendant ingenuity, the “greatest country in the world” would never reach a point of contemplating, employing, or condoning such uncivilized methods as a last resort, not even in the face of Panginia’s insuperable might?